Lesson 7Graphs of Proportional Relationships
Learning Goal
Let’s see how graphs of proportional relationships differ from graphs of other relationships.
Learning Targets
I can find the constant of proportionality from a graph.
I know that the graph of a proportional relationship lies on a line through
.
Lesson Terms
- coordinate plane
- origin
Warm Up: Notice These Points
Problem 1
What do you notice about the graph?
Print Version
Plot the points
. What do you notice about the graph?
Activity 1: T-shirts for Sale
Some T-shirts cost $8 each.
Problem 1
Use the table to answer these questions.
What does
represent? What does
represent? Is there a proportional relationship between
and ?
Problem 2
Plot the pairs from the previously given table on the coordinate plane.
Print Version
Plot the pairs from the previously given table on the coordinate plane.
Problem 3
What do you notice about the graph?
Activity 2: Tyler’s Walk
Problem 1
Tyler was at the amusement park. He walked at a steady pace from the ticket booth to the bumper cars.
time | distance |
---|---|
The point on the graph shows his arrival at the bumper cars. What do the coordinates of the point tell us about the situation?
The table representing Tyler’s walk shows other values of time and distance. Complete the table. Next, plot the pairs of values on the grid.
What does the point
mean in this situation? How far away from the ticket booth was Tyler after 1 second? Label the point on the graph that shows this information with its coordinates.
What is the constant of proportionality for the relationship between time and distance? What does it tell you about Tyler’s walk? Where do you see it in the graph?
Are you ready for more?
Problem 1
If Tyler wanted to get to the bumper cars in half the time, how would the graph representing his walk change? How would the table change? What about the constant of proportionality?
Lesson Summary
One way to represent a proportional relationship is with a graph. Here is a graph that represents different amounts that fit the situation, “Blueberries cost $6 per pound.”
Different points on the graph tell us, for example, that 2 pounds of blueberries cost $12, and 4.5 pounds of blueberries cost $27.
Sometimes it makes sense to connect the points with a line, and sometimes it doesn’t. We could buy, for example, 4.5 pounds of blueberries or 1.875 pounds of blueberries, so all the points in between the whole numbers make sense in the situation, so any point on the line is meaningful.
If the graph represented the cost for different numbers of sandwiches (instead of pounds of blueberries), it might not make sense to connect the points with a line, because it is often not possible to buy 4.5 sandwiches or 1.875 sandwiches. Even if only points make sense in the situation, though, sometimes we connect them with a line anyway to make the relationship easier to see.
Graphs that represent proportional relationships all have a few things in common:
There are points that satisfy the relationship lie on a straight line.
The line that they lie on passes through the origin,
.
Here are some graphs that do not represent proportional relationships:
These points do not lie on a line.
This is a line, but it doesn’t go through the origin.
Here is a different example of a relationship represented by this table where
The equation
Here is the graph of this relationship.
If
If
We can find the constant of proportionality by looking at the graph, because
In general, when is proportional to